WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu)

To: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu)
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2010年2月23日 21:03:04 +0000
Cc: "Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2010年2月23日 13:04:02 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100223114646.70e196ea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acq0wQ0BEWm+IryaTBab+4z7DGRfBwACooZ5
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu)
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.23.0.091001
On 23/02/2010 19:46, "Mukesh Rathor" <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> struct cpu_user_regs *regs = guest_cpu_user_regs(); <------
>
> The cpu is clearly running idle_vcpu, so current is correctly pointing
> to idle vcpu. But guest_mode() is showing guest mode incorrectly.
>
> I'm not much familiar with ns16550 stuff, so cant' think of a fix other
> than just setting regs to current stack pointer in ns16550_poll().
>
> __asm__ ( "movq %%rsp,%0" : "=r" (val));
> struct cpu_user_regs *regs = val;
>
> Let me know if you like the fix and I'll submit a patch.
Given the only thing this apparently affected was some of your own ad-hoc
debug code, do we really care about this at all? We can probably happily
just leave it.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][2/4] Enable 1GB for Xen HVM host page , Keir Fraser
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] windows domU disk performance graph comparing hvm vs stubdom vs pv drivers , Keith Coleman
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu) , Mukesh Rathor
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu) , Mukesh Rathor
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /