WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

[Xen-devel] RE: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC

To: "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] RE: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2010年2月16日 15:15:41 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, AndrewPeace <Andrew.Peace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kurt.hackel@xxxxxxxxxx, Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, TimDeegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Patrick Colp <pjcolp@xxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Grzegorz Milos <gm281@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2010年2月16日 07:16:18 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <d2556e50-476d-487d-8fa8-aae67f63396c@default >
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <2af13319-6b44-44e2-ab62-a0615208cf64@default > <C79F1B58.A196%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <78c49794-4454-4c3b-80a6-72efcbc73fb3@default ><78c49794-4454-4c3b-80a6-72efcbc73fb3@default > <057c0f45-9c97-4b8a-8efa-1726fd951e19@default 4B7A6363020000780002F93C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><4B7A6363020000780002F93C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <d2556e50-476d-487d-8fa8-aae67f63396c@default >
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> 16.02.10 16:05 >>>
>Under what circumstances does dom0 require single-page-below-4G
>allocations? Is it only for bounce buffers for PCI passthrough
>of old devices with 32-bit addressing limitations? Or am I
>missing a much more common case?
Not just for pass-through; all devices only supporting 32-bit
addressing would have such requirements, and particularly common
ones are display adapters which have DRM/AGP drivers loaded for
them.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: [Xen-devel] RE: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC , Dan Magenheimer
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] RE: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC , Dan Magenheimer
Previous by Thread: [Xen-devel] RE: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC , Dan Magenheimer
Next by Thread: [Xen-devel] RE: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC , Dan Magenheimer
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /