On 08/02/2010 11:09, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I was wondering whether this changeset is actually a bad idea in light of
>> memory hot-add, as now implemented by Yunhong? I would imagine this can mean
>> that max_mfn is now dynamic, and can increase in value after boot. So would
>> 20892 thus leave all existing guests (e.g., dom0!) broken after a hot-add
>> which adds new highest RAM addresses?
>
> You probably overlooked the
>
> + if ( !mem_hotplug )
Yeah, I looked at the changeset comment and not the patch itself! Sorry
about that.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel