WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

[Xen-devel] RE: tmem - really default to on?

To: "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] RE: tmem - really default to on?
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2010年2月05日 08:39:04 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2010年2月05日 00:38:49 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <e5c76b64-7bbe-4ee8-aec4-a86836b7a159@default >
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4B669BDB020000780002CEFC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <e5c76b64-7bbe-4ee8-aec4-a86836b7a159@default >
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> 04.02.10 22:01 >>>
>A) There is some order>0 memory allocation in Xen domain creation
>that doesn't fall back to order=0, that I've not seen in my testing
>but shows up in your systems (or has very recently been added).
>If true, this is a problem not only for tmem but also for all other
>memory optimization work and we need to identify and (if possible)
>fix it.
This is the case - x86's shadow code does all its allocations as order-2
with no (possible the way things are designed) fallback.
Also, the domain structure itself is of order 4 (38k), obviously without
fallback (and even with address range restriction, though that one
is affecting only really big machines, and it could be lifted to
effectively not be a restriction anymore, i.e. just serve documentation
purposes).
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Problems with serial console , Keir Fraser
Next by Date: RE: [Xen-devel] cpuidle causing Dom0 soft lockups , Jan Beulich
Previous by Thread: [Xen-devel] RE: tmem - really default to on? , Dan Magenheimer
Next by Thread: [Xen-devel] RE: tmem - really default to on? , Dan Magenheimer
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /