Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 31/01/2010 14:04, "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> According to your suggestion, I plan to modify the patch as:
>> 1. cancel method NTFY, merge it into method PRSC;
>> 2. at method PRSC, only scan 'maxvcpus' times. we can transfer
>> 'maxvcpus' (which comes from cmdline) from qemu to dsdt side through
>> bios_info; 
>> 3. at mk_dsdt.c, add some comments to make it clear;
>> Do you think it OK?
>
> I don't even mind if you don't do #2. That's up to you. Bear in mind
> that to be able to merge NTFY into PRSC, you will have to completely
> unroll PRSC (one way to view it is moving the loops out of the DSDT
> and into mk_dsdt.c, to be executed at build time and produce
> straight-line code). That would mean you emit the code to check
> against max_vcpus 128 times. Is it worth it? I don't know.
Keir,
How about the followed update:
1. keep original method NTFY, keep decision_tree to reduce scan loop;
2. update method PRSC
 1). transfer para 'maxvcpus' (comes from config file) from qemu to 
mk_dsdt.c through bios_info;
 2). at PRSC, only scan 'maxvcpus' vcpus;
because maxvcpus< 128, no risk for NTFY then.
Thanks,
Jinsong
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel