On 18/01/2010 08:53, "Andre Przywara" <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Keir Fraser wrote:
>> I had a go myself: see c/s 20817. This keeps nr_nodes as well as
>> max_node_id, and continues to use it where it seemed to make sense to do so.
>
> c/s 20817 seems OK to me. Actually that was how I started, but then
> decided to drop max_node_id because I didn't see the sense in keeping
> two variables which actually differ just by 1.
They don't merely differ by one if there are holes in the node-id namespace.
Can that happen in practice? I'm not sure; but it's easy enough for the
tools to handle that case, so they might as well.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel