WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Xen-devel] [timer/ticks related] dom0 hang during boot on large 1TB

To: "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [timer/ticks related] dom0 hang during boot on large 1TB system
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2010年1月05日 08:33:56 +0000
Cc: kurt.hackel@xxxxxxxxxx, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2010年1月05日 00:33:55 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <296fb010-9c01-4285-895e-35532a8e0726@default >
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4B41B37502000078000280BB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <296fb010-9c01-4285-895e-35532a8e0726@default >
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> 04.01.10 23:07 >>>
>If there are known issues with 1TB of memory in this
>configuration, we'd like to understand them. If 1Tb with
>32-bit dom0 is rife with hidden unresolvable problems,
>we'd like to make a clear support statement as to what the
>physical memory limit is.
I can't say there are known problems, but I'm convinced not everything
can work properly above the boundary of 168G. Nevertheless it is quite
possible that most or all of the normal (not error handling) code paths
work well. Page table walks e.g. during exceptions or kexec would be
problem candidates. And while my knowledge of the tools is rather
limited, libxc also has - iirc - several hard coded assumptions that might
not hold.
What is clear though is that you also depend on the memory distribution
across the (physical) address space: Contiguous (apart from the below-
4G hole) memory will likely represent little problems, but sparse memory
crossing the 44-bit boundary can't work in any case (since MFNs are
represented as 32-bit quantities in 32-bit Dom0).
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Paging and memory sharing for HVM guests , Jan Beulich
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Tagging Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate , Jan Beulich
Previous by Thread: RE: [Xen-devel] [timer/ticks related] dom0 hang during boot on large 1TB system , Ian Campbell
Next by Thread: RE: [Xen-devel] [timer/ticks related] dom0 hang during boot on large 1TB system , Dan Magenheimer
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /