| To: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] Fw: Re: migration and snapshots. |
| From: | J Nb <j_nwb@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 2 Jan 2010 15:44:03 -0800 (PST) |
| Delivery-date: | 2010年1月02日 15:44:27 -0800 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1262475843; bh=q3oGUsxIVg+sgK8uX9TpF3r610NJCcDqbPA3uHWYm+8=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=eglZrEPwAzML4Et3+7ptw+ZdZP19K00UET+ySzi56biFPX/dLob8hDEoonblZzvpqER1cb7alQpW7tcG7QSmgvHnqYotTCQOFdIW6Q5LKegGGvmodpXPpS/mv/5Alr4pfgQXD3eGaXufplxvoUzTj0oaw1zT5qXIMqp74WN+Evs= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=yu4Fq/jUvxvgzCQtveya5/j7aMsBiaCKMrkQRWs7+51wRiMh7tKf5ETNhDOy6ogd0wBC+IFwgoAYzXBDj/ue9ZHHp7+iz9KBZpnkckslyl7sJFt3ZUjO6sAYl617SSSIyLbySlTyc0CsvzkTjiGRiNrlCb8udqKpKh9V0xopJiI=; |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
>From the thread it looks like it made it in post 3.4. Can this be made available to Xen in existing distros ? (RHEL/SLES) So that people can reliably use it ? Also, it is not clear (to me) if this is done for PV or HVM or both ? Thanks -nb --- On Fri, 1/1/10, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote: > From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> > Subject: Re: migration and snapshots. > To: "J Nb" <j_nwb@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "kvm" <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Friday, January 1, 2010, 9:12 AM > On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:55:34AM > -0800, J Nb wrote: > > What would be a good storage topology for allowing for > migration as well as support snapshots (for backup) > > > > Would love to hear recommendations as well as details > on setup that people are using. (I am assuming that this is > possible.) > > > > Here is my current understanding... > > > > LVM -- Snapshots but not shared. > > CLVM -- shared but no snapshots. (yet) > > NFS/GFS -- Shared FS but no snapshots > > > > > > qcow2 files and VHD file supports snapshots... but VHD > is not yet available in Xen or KVM. > > > > blktap2 backend in Xen supports VHD. > > See: http://markmail.org/message/dqcil5uyigwlk2sr > > -- Pasi > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Is there a way for privileged domain to map arbitrary machine page? , Samuel Thibault |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Fw: Re: migration and snapshots / Xen blktap2 support , Pasi Kärkkäinen |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Is there a way for privileged domain to map arbitrary machine page? , Wei LIU |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] Fw: Re: migration and snapshots / Xen blktap2 support , Pasi Kärkkäinen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |