WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Xen-devel] rdtscP and xen (and maybe the app-tsc answer I've been l

To: dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] rdtscP and xen (and maybe the app-tsc answer I've been looking for)
From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2009年9月21日 07:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Jan, kurt.hackel@xxxxxxxxxx, "Xen-Devel \(E-mail\)" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2009年9月21日 07:48:59 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <b02785ac-8a04-4bb1-9d24-08345bb0f87a@default >
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Why do you need to distinguish between the two emulated 
> rdtscp cases? 
> > Special-casing a version of '0' is awkward because it would arise
> > naturally from version wraparound (after 2^31 time 
> parameter updates,
> > but still).
>
> You're right, I don't need to differentiate between
> the two emulated cases. I was trying to overload
> an extra piece of information that I really don't
> need to overload.
>
> However, I do need one special case to indicate
> emulation vs non-emulation, so wraparound is
> still a problem.
>
> Fortunately, wraparound should only occur impossibly
> rarely (see below), probably less frequently than
> TSC wraparound.
I realized later that since Xen controls the values
placed in TSC_AUX, it can easily skip any special-cased
values. Then wraparound is not a problem as long as
the app tests for "version number is different" rather
than "version number is greater."
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Announcing xen/master: pvops git trees rearranged (AMD tests?) , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] pvops: AHCI problems with SB600 , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Previous by Thread: RE: [Xen-devel] rdtscP and xen (and maybe the app-tsc answer I've been looking for) , Dan Magenheimer
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] rdtscP and xen (and maybe the app-tsc answer I've been looking for) , Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /