WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] paravirtualized vs HVM disk interference (85% vs 15%)

To: "Protti, Duilio J" <duilio.j.protti@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] paravirtualized vs HVM disk interference (85% vs 15%)
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2009年1月27日 08:22:05 +0000
Cc:
Delivery-date: 2009年1月27日 00:21:52 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <A27F6E592261774D9987F44C554C834D1643C0B2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcmAQYW6JmoDnts9S3SlKixorZ19LQAFtCTL
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] paravirtualized vs HVM disk interference (85% vs 15%)
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.15.0.081119
On 27/01/2009 05:38, "Protti, Duilio J" <duilio.j.protti@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> - Is the behavior ok? We mean, we consider that this interference is
> undesirable for certain deployments (anyone with paravirtualized and HVM
> guests in the same box, like in example Linux+Windows2003, and you want a fair
> share of the disk transfer rate). What we are asking is if this is a
> consequence of the Xen design and a known behavior, and if there is a
> workaround to ameliorate the interference (the problem persists and in the
> same degree even if both guests perform writes below dom0's dirty_ratio).
Run PV drivers in the HVM guest. This will automatically mean the HVM guest
is using a more efficient data channel, of the same sort as the PV guest. If
you need further fairness guarantees you can make use of one of Linux's fair
queuing disc schedulers.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] big local array in routine in hypervisor , Keir Fraser
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] Re: lmbench lat_mmap slowdown with CONFIG_PARAVIRT , Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Previous by Thread: [Xen-devel] paravirtualized vs HVM disk interference (85% vs 15%) , Protti, Duilio J
Next by Thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86-64: also use 1G page mappings for M2P table , Jan Beulich
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /