| To: | Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] page ref/type count overflows |
| From: | Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2009年1月26日 13:33:57 +0000 |
| Cc: | |
| Delivery-date: | 2009年1月26日 05:34:11 -0800 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <497DC465.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | Acl/ur0ZUqRKrWkdnU2n7WXpz2EAfA== |
| Thread-topic: | [Xen-devel] page ref/type count overflows |
| User-agent: | Microsoft-Entourage/12.14.0.081024 |
On 26/01/2009 13:10, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The backend drivers in my opinion have no alternative to getting taught > to do full error checking in order to avoid the respective DomU-induced > problems. Backend drivers, which get their mappings via grants, have sufficient checking already don't they? As for the general issue, why fudge around it when for any modern system we can just fix it? By which I mean, x64 systems with CMPXCHG16 support (everything but ancient Opterons?) can have a full domain pointer and a long count_info in struct page_info, and still update both atomically. It'd be a smaller patch, and it'd be less kludgy. Disadvantages are extra 8 bytes per page (which I think is okay, particularly to fix this nasty issue in a clean way) and only fixes the issue for x64 (I personally don't care about non-regressions for i386, especially when the cost of the fix in this case would be IMO high in code complexity and ugliness). Already there is no reason why type_info (an unsigned long) could not have a wider count. It's just no use until count_info is widened. What do you say to that then? :-) -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: unitialised return value in xenbus_write_transaction , Ingo Molnar |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] page ref/type count overflows , Keir Fraser |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] page ref/type count overflows , Jan Beulich |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] page ref/type count overflows , Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |