xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <> wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 January 2009 03:12:51 Ke, Liping wrote:
>
> When I defined the API, I already knew that 5 is not enough for Intel.
> So I made struct mc_info large enough to keep multiple entities in any
> combination. I expected from you to fill struct mcinfo_extended two or
> three times into struct mc_info the same way as you do with
> struct mcinfo_bank. There's no (additional) allocation needed.
Just as Liping has pointed out, since there is size caculated in mcinfo_common, 
it should be ok for this changes, especially considering just increase the 
size, not decrease. 
Anyway, let's wait for Frank and Gavin's changes. 
BTW, do you know any usage for this MCA mechanism except Sun? We are 
considering more changes to Xen's MCA and some suggestion is send to mailing 
list (http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2008-12/msg00643.html 
gives three options ), we want get feedback from them and you, to avoid 
suprise in last minutes again.
Thanks
Yunhong Jiang
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel