WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] pv_ops dom0 kernel failure with ata_piix

To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] pv_ops dom0 kernel failure with ata_piix
From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 19:40:06 +0200
Cc: Todd Deshane <deshantm@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2009年1月09日 09:40:38 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20090102064444.GN15052@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20081230144422.GD15052@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1e16a9ed0812300803i325f3f02qa8d501fe13456e96@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081230161939.GG15052@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081230162835.GH15052@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1e16a9ed0812300847s5dd1c2afj4fabcd4169258e40@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081230165211.GI15052@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081230181845.GK15052@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081230190356.GL15052@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <495BE5E1.40602@xxxxxxxx> <20090102064444.GN15052@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006年08月11日)
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 08:44:44AM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 08:36:33AM +1100, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > >On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 08:18:45PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > > 
> > >>On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 06:52:11PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > >> 
> > >>>On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 11:47:40AM -0500, Todd Deshane wrote:
> > >>> 
> > >>>>On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>>> 
> > >>>>>>>Try changing the SATA mode of the disk in the BIOS to either legacy 
> > >>>>>>>or
> > >>>>>>>ATA, depending
> > >>>>>>>on what you bios supports.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>There is still a known issue with some of the AHCI stuff.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>I'm not using AHCI at all.. AHCI (SATA) controller does not have any 
> > >>>>>>disks
> > >>>>>>plugged in.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>My (only) disk is attached to IDE/PATA ICH6 controller..
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 
> > >>>>>I tried disabling AHCI anyway (even when I'm not using the AHCI SATA
> > >>>>>controller), but it didn't help.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>Booting the pv_ops dom0 kernel still fails.. because the IDE/PATA 
> > >>>>>controller
> > >>>>>still gets disabled (just like in the logs above) for some unknown 
> > >>>>>reason.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>-- Pasi
> > >>>>> 
> > >>>>So from the log it looks like you are getting a hard crash?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> 
> > >>>No, it's not a hard crash.. I'm able to reboot the box with 
> > >>>ctrl-alt-del. 
> > >>> 
> > >>>>Did you try adding noreboot to the xen command line and then trying
> > >>>>to get any more information with sysreq stuff?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>Another thing that I noticed in the log is:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>irq 12: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
> > >>>>
> > >>>>Is it an smp kernel? I had some weird problems when passing nosmp at
> > >>>>one point.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> 
> > >>>Yep, it is SMP kernel.. 
> > >>> 
> > >>> 
> > >>>>I don't recognize this crash, those module traces, at least for me were
> > >>>>non-fatal and didn't cause a crash. I was normally just dropped to a
> > >>>>initramfs prompt in the case when the disk was not detected properly.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>I was then able to at least look around and check that modules were
> > >>>>loaded correctly etc.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> 
> > >>>The problem seems to be the IDE controller/disk is not detected at all..
> > >>>because the device gets disabled for some reason during ata_piix
> > >>>loading/probing.. 
> > >>>
> > >>>That is the only disk I have, so the root partition is on it.
> > >>>
> > >>>Same kernel works just fine on baremetal without Xen.
> > >>>
> > >>> 
> > >>So I guess the subject should be 'failure with ata_piix' instead of 
> > >>'crash'.. 
> > >>Anyway, there seems to be problems with ata_piix too.. in addition to 
> > >>AHCI.
> > >>
> > >>Jeremy: Can you think of anything to try? 
> > >>
> > >> 
> > >
> > >I tried booting with "nosmp" dom0 kernel parameter:
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes, nosmp is known to make things worse. It has the side-effect of 
> > disabling io_apic support, so all the interrupt stuff fails in the way 
> > you've noticed.
> > 
>
> Yep. "nosmp" was just something I tried to see if it makes any difference.
> It didn't help.
>
> Anyway, have you seen/heard of this problem with ata_piix earlier? 
>
> http://pasik.reaktio.net/xen/pv_ops-dom0-debug/pv_ops-dom0-bootlog-1.txt 
> http://pasik.reaktio.net/xen/pv_ops-dom0-debug/pv_ops-dom0-bootlog-2.txt 
>
> Same kernel on baremetal without Xen:
> http://pasik.reaktio.net/xen/pv_ops-dom0-debug/baremetal-dmesg.txt 
>
I just upgraded to newly released Xen 3.3.1 hypervisor but unfortunately it
didn't seem to help with my problem.. I still get the exact same errors with
ata_piix module:
http://pasik.reaktio.net/xen/pv_ops-dom0-debug/pv_ops-dom0-bootlog-4-xen331.txt
xen_allocate_pirq: returning irq 30 for gsi 18
xen_set_ioapic_routing: irq 30 gsi 18 vector 160 ioapic 0 pin 18 triggering 0 
polarity 1
ata_piix .&checktime(0000,00,1,':')f.1: PCI INT A -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 30
xen: PCI device .&checktime(0000,00,1,':')f.1 pin 1 -> irq 30
xen: disable pci device .&checktime(0000,00,1,':')f.1
ata_piix: probe of .&checktime(0000,00,1,':')f.1 failed with error -38
-- Pasi
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] pv_ops dom0 and kernel console output problem , Pasi Kärkkäinen
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Use -MMD -MF in tools/* rather than -Wp,-M... , Ian Jackson
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] pv_ops dom0 kernel failure with ata_piix , Pasi Kärkkäinen
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] pv_ops dom0 kernel failure with ata_piix , Andrew Lyon
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /