WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Xen-devel] TPR write optimization (even improves 2003 sp2)

To: "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] TPR write optimization (even improves 2003 sp2)
From: "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 20:33:27 +1100
Cc:
Delivery-date: 2009年1月07日 01:33:56 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C58A2447.20CEB%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01550242@trantor > <C58A2447.20CEB%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AclwbQESFc81qMn2SR2vAjv2yU5MgQABpemAAAyUQdEAAFfuQAAAdgGuAAA1Q7A=
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] TPR write optimization (even improves 2003 sp2)
> On 07/01/2009 09:14, "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
> > Travis said that the testing he did showed that the value changed
every
> > write. The 'lazy' bit works by only writing when it actually makes a
> > difference (eg don't write TPR until there is an actual interrupt
> > pending I think). It's (probably much) less efficient for the case
when
> > a lower priority interrupt interrupts what should be a higher
priority
> > interrupt (but isn't, because we haven't written TPR yet), but is
much
> > more efficient for the most common case where it doesn't get
> > interrupted. That's quite a bit more complicated than 'if new_tpr ==
> > old_tpr then write else nop'...
>
> Hmmm, you could be right. I suppose xentrace can confirm one way or
the
> other once you have it set up...
>
I am probably showing a lack of understanding about how the APIC works
here, but from a very brief look at what writing to the TPR register
does, all I can see is that it sets a value in vlapic->regs->data. Could
I just map a page from the DomU into xen and assign a byte in there as
the TPR register (one byte per CPU). I would need a new hypercall to
turn this on but that's no big deal. Or is there more to a TPR write
than just setting vlapic->regs->data?
Thanks
James
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] TPR write optimization (even improves 2003 sp2) , Keir Fraser
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] AMD P-States not recognized for Xen 3.3 and 3.4 , Carsten Schiers
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] TPR write optimization (even improves 2003 sp2) , Keir Fraser
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] TPR write optimization (even improves 2003 sp2) , Keir Fraser
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /