WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: BSOD "A clock interrupt was not recevied onasecondar

To: Steve Prochniak <sprochniak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: BSOD "A clock interrupt was not recevied onasecondary processor within the allocated time interval"
From: Ben Guthro <bguthro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2009年1月05日 16:32:27 -0500
Cc: Andrew Lyon <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx>, "Xen-Devel \(E-mail\)" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2009年1月05日 13:33:19 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <B99564216C25704085A82B41C46DD3420883448E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <f4527be0812290132p2f29afe1k5dbad3888ee552ba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f4527be0901021033o64508d9fs91b4f063c845936b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <B99564216C25704085A82B41C46DD342088343FA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f4527be0901051224r6f5c9223me8c850f51ba65752@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <B99564216C25704085A82B41C46DD3420883448E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081119)
This was never accepted by upstream Xen, as originally submitted by Ky from Novell:

original submission:
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2008-02/msg00630.html



Steve Prochniak wrote on 01/05/2009 03:55 PM: [Andrew - you can run the "Novell Shim" which makes the hypervisor conform to the Microsoft spec enough that the guest OSs will turn off watchdog timeouts (0x101 BSoDs)... Steve -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Lyon [mailto:andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 3:24 PM To: Steve Prochniak; Xen-Devel (E-mail); xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: BSOD "A clock interrupt was not recevied onasecondary processor within the allocated time interval" On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Steve Prochniak <sprochniak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
All Microsoft 6.0 and beyond Operating Systems have a sense of
'enlightment' which means they try to talk to the underlying
 
hypervisor
 
- and if there is one, they do certain things like turn off 101
bugchecks. The only real way to get Vista and beyond to work
 
correctly
 
with SMP is to make Xen conform to Microsoft's hypervisor spec.
 
I vaguely recall there being a way to make xen "lie" to the OS about
the type of hypervisor, it might only be a feature on the commercial
citrix xenserver?
So basically there is no way to run Windows Vista or 2008 on Xen
without risk of a 101 BSOD under load?
If that is true then its a severe problem and Xen is useless for newer
MS OS's :(
Has anybody else had this problem and found a solution?
Andy
 
-----Original Message-----
From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andrew
 
Lyon
 
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 1:34 PM
To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Xen-Devel (E-mail)
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: BSOD "A clock interrupt was not recevied
onasecondary processor within the allocated time interval"
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Andrew Lyon <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
 
Hi,
When dom0 is under heavy load any Vista or Windows 2008 HVM's that
 
are
 
running and have multiple cpu's assigned often BSOD with code
0x00000101 "A clock interrupt was not recevied ona secondary
processor within the allocated time interval"
It only happens if the load in dom0 is high enough to make the mouse
pointer lagged, once the mouse fails to track in realtime the hvm's
start to bsod within a few seconds.
I have tried several versions of Xen including 3.2, 3.3 and 3.3.1
 
rc4,
 
and various kernels including the 2.6.18 xensource and 2.6.27-xen.hg.
Here is a example config from one of my vista hvms, is there a
timer/rtc setting that I need to add to avoid this problem?
import os, re
arch = os.uname()[4]
if re.search('64', arch):
 arch_libdir = 'lib64'
else:
 arch_libdir = 'lib'
kernel = "/usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader"
builder='hvm'
memory = 2048
name = "Vistax86"
uuid = "b7bd2f2f-169f-4789-8aee-eaa77c543c99"
vcpus=8
vif = [ 'mac=00:16:3e:7d:bc:b1' ]
disk = [ 'phy:/dev/vg_raptor/lv_vistax86,hda,w', ',hdc:cdrom,r' ]
device_model = '/usr/' + arch_libdir + '/xen/bin/qemu-dm'
boot="d"
sdl=0
vnc=1
vnclisten="127.0.0.1"
vncdisplay=11
vncpasswd='vv8176a'
stdvga=0
serial='pty'
usbdevice='tablet'
 
cpuid=['1:edx=xxx1xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,ebx=xxxxxxxx00010000xxxxx
 
xxxxxxxxxxx','4,0:eax=001111xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx']
 
keymap='en-gb'
Andy
 
I think this is a known issue which has incorrectly been marked as
FIXED in bugzilla:
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1117
there is a second bug report of the same problem, this time with more
details:
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1065
Is there a fix?
Andy
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: RE: [Xen-devel] linux-2.6.27-xen.hg , Boris Derzhavets
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: BSOD "A clock interrupt was not recevied onasecondary processor within the allocated time interval" , Keir Fraser
Previous by Thread: RE: [Xen-devel] Re: BSOD "A clock interrupt was not recevied onasecondary processor within the allocated time interval" , Steve Prochniak
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: BSOD "A clock interrupt was not recevied onasecondary processor within the allocated time interval" , Keir Fraser
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /