Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 06/12/2008 11:45, "Li, Haicheng" <haicheng.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> This is our weekly test report for Xen-unstable tree. Two new issues
>> were found; P1 bug #1393 should be always there, and was just
>> exposed by a new test case. 
>> 
>> New Bugs:
>> =====================================================================
>> 1. SMP 64bit Solaris10u5 causes Xen crash.
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1393 
>> 2. cpu idle time / cpufreq residency becomes extremely large.
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1394 
>
> There's a good chance that at least bug #1 is fixed on current tip
> (c/s 18881).
>
OK, we will check it with c/s 18881, thanks.
-haicheng
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel