| To: | "Y. D." <duyuyang@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Re: [Xen-devel] mini-os: a event channel experiment |
| From: | "Paul Samon" <paul.samon@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2008年10月29日 11:23:41 +0800 |
| Cc: | |
| Delivery-date: | 2008年10月28日 20:24:04 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=pBdfVKiKpsg+2bqnXlR6aUlr1CLkQ58O+YBUDV3ng/c=; b=D3NiE9Cx80DvYZn+zRfGUoqJDhiGpn2L50xxbuE9hKkPG79ZtfyjnBcjYHhTfv7/sG zUfKn6feevftRuwmGbB0kstBdSREFDeZfbWfUu6PptjejXktFrUY+WLc8c7fQOy/hRGa y9qPPYbg7l53H4lgMvCzmXFaHprrWgJKyZDlo= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=pkhYYxscqy9YOxwyyh8j9ZvavuB1tJM36+iAwAgxKuAZvsZREjTOcr0V4bhD8PWS+U BKSNVkq6+S7Q5IWgV87b3EWB0BjiORhfTUzLZPI2Olnz4jGNrQ9SqPiF+0eOsRqaN9dm yHyrHtCI8opWZV/S1+/YnTL8y5+VFWkibOO3c= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200810291117474395854@xxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <200810290947322981037@xxxxxxxxx> <200810291117474395854@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
It worked. I totally forgot that.
Thank you very much.
shawn
------------------
Y. D.
2008年10月29日
-------------------------------------------------------------
From:Paul Samon
Date:2008年10月29日 10:12:43
To:Y. D.
Cc:xen-devel
Subject:Re: [Xen-devel] mini-os: a event channel experiment
I think you need an "EVTCHNOP_unmask" invocation for the port in domain A.
-- Paul S.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Y. D. <duyuyang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In a mini-os domain A, I start a thread allocating an event channel:
> err = evtchn_alloc_unbound(remote_domid, experiment_handler, NULL, &port);
> and registered a handler. The err value is 0. The thread normally exits.
>
> While in another mini-os domain B, I start a thread binding that event
> channel:
> err = evtchn_bind_interdomain(remote_domid, remote_port, experiment_handler2, NULL, &port);
>
> and send a event:
> err = HYPERVISOR_event_channel_op(EVTCHNOP_send, &event); Both err is 0.
> The thread normally exits.
>
> but in the domain A, the event handler is not called.
>
> What is wrong with it?
>
> Thanks,
>
> shawn
>
>
> 2008年10月29日
> ------------------------------
> Y. D.
>> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
>
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel][PATCH] Cpufreq domain structure update from array to link list , Liu, Jinsong |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Re: Re: Re: [Xen-devel] exception handler caused by context switching and setting trap flag , Paul Samon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] mini-os: a event channel experiment , Paul Samon |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel][PATCH] Cpufreq domain structure update from array to link list , Liu, Jinsong |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |