| To: | Chris Lalancette <clalance@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]: Better checking in range_straddles_page_boundary |
| From: | Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2008年10月22日 11:47:03 +0100 |
| Cc: | |
| Delivery-date: | 2008年10月22日 03:47:26 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <48FEECE3.207@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | Ack0M4Siwv280qAmEd2kCAAX8io7RQ== |
| Thread-topic: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH]: Better checking in range_straddles_page_boundary |
| User-agent: | Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122 |
On 22/10/08 10:05, "Chris Lalancette" <clalance@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Attached is a simple patch to slightly rework the logic in > range_straddles_page_boundary(). The reason for this is to avoid a crash we > are > seeing on 32-bit dom0. Basically, the contiguous_bitmap is allocated based on > max_low_pfn. However, the swiotlb code can be passed a request (in > swiotlb_map_sg) that is > 1 page (I've seen 2 pages), and is also a page > (sg->page) > max_low_pfn. If this combination happens, then you get a fatal > page fault when doing the test_bit(pfn, contiguous_bitmap). For that reason, > rework the logic in range_straddles_page_boundary so that if it gets a request > > > 1 page, and it's above max_low_pfn, then we force the splitting of the > request. > In our testing, this seems to fix the issue. How about we just get rid of the contiguous_bitmap? We might as well if you are going to push that check after calling check_pages_physically_contiguous(), since no extent which is acceptable to contiguous_bitmap should fail on check_pages_physically_contiguous(). I think I kept contiguous_bitmap only as a fast check before calling that slower function. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [VTD] Remove PCI device enumeration for dom0 in Xen , Keir Fraser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]: Better checking in range_straddles_page_boundary , Chris Lalancette |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH]: Better checking in range_straddles_page_boundary , Chris Lalancette |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]: Better checking in range_straddles_page_boundary , Chris Lalancette |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |