| To: | "George Dunlap" <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] vcpu_info |
| From: | "pallavi jk" <pallutai@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2008年10月10日 18:30:39 +0530 |
| Cc: | |
| Delivery-date: | 2008年10月10日 06:01:03 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=YZGniftq7HsNiq4T6paFROvcUzAJL0WkebPoOP9o1/k=; b=i5NNwENEVVZf2gq8Do2AdDZlFIczwDLj7kBgKhn+japIH+fOM72bq3alT8mvzKAS6M GDrV9t/CDrzp8G75t+Jm/P1dwxAF6EdcrykI57jR0mUjRDN3/nEBT2+kY8lc8ReBfdVQ yLP1yjVc0zMtktckoSfjIPKb1Oz+xPz8M+2f0= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=uLkCc+cIG/f2v+e2CQGuzqJnNzMJNieY6AcF0H0ChHzVZv9jVEzekvpQcVMQKubdQR z/ALXp5UdzfRjiob5Bk4bspJM1uPLLCcfTGMNjS0wbJz6IoLtuLNy/XspjPMcdJEQVW2 S9E40E9xU1P2jCqPWylKEQaAODpCtDgRC4j5U= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <de76405a0810100545i35523668gc04705ea3c191b3c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <a55a39a90810100537l14197952k4dfef518f6527604@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <de76405a0810100545i35523668gc04705ea3c191b3c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
It's worth a shot looking there. Certainly 3+ will have it for sure.
Is there a particular reason you want to avoid that struct?
-George
> _______________________________________________
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 1:37 PM, pallavi jk <pallutai@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Can anyone please tell me what was the xen version in which struct vcpu_info
> was not present?
>
> Should I see in xen 2.0 ?...I need a xen version without "struct vcpu_info"
>
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
>
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] vcpu_info , George Dunlap |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] timer_mode default change?!? , Ian Jackson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] vcpu_info , George Dunlap |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] vcpu_info , Jeremy Fitzhardinge |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |