WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Error while running the xm test suite: Cannot handle

To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Error while running the xm test suite: Cannot handle page request order 0!
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2008年9月16日 20:09:24 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2008年9月16日 12:09:20 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C4F5C18D.1D441%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AckYLuSfI3re2oQiEd2riAAWy6hiGQAANaUg
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Re: Error while running the xm test suite: Cannot handle page request order 0!
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122
It’s the Xen heap which is running out of memory (a fixed size ~10MB heap which Xen’s internal book-keeping structures are allocated from). Either demands have increased on that heap, or something is leaking.

-- Keir

On 16/9/08 20:03, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Unfortunately I don’t think xm-test has been running in our automated tests for a while, so I’m not sure when this issue would have been introduced.

-- Keir

On 16/9/08 18:09, "Stefan Berger" <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Keir,

memory should not be the problem unless the memory requirements of those test domains have been increased considerably recently. Here's the upper part of 'xm dmesg':

\ \/ /___ _ __ |___ /| || | _ _ _ __ ___| |_ __ _| |__ | | ___
\ // _ \ '_ \ |_ \| || |_ __| | | | '_ \/ __| __/ _` | '_ \| |/ _ \
/ \ __/ | | | ___) |__ _|__| |_| | | | \__ \ || (_| | |_) | | __/
/_/\_\___|_| |_| |____(_) |_| \__,_|_| |_|___/\__\__,_|_.__/|_|\___|

(XEN) Xen version 3.4-unstable (root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) (gcc version 4.3.0 20080428 (Red Hat 4.3.0-8) (GCC) ) Tue Sep 16 07:20:38 EDT 2008
(XEN) Latest ChangeSet: Mon Sep 15 17:10:43 2008 +0100 18482:087008dfb005
(XEN) Command line: dom0_mem=1G
(XEN) Video information:
(XEN) VGA is text mode 80x25, font 8x16
(XEN) VBE/DDC methods: none; EDID transfer time: 2 seconds
(XEN) EDID info not retrieved because no DDC retrieval method detected
(XEN) Disc information:
(XEN) Found 1 MBR signatures
(XEN) Found 1 EDD information structures
(XEN) Xen-e820 RAM map:
(XEN) 0000000000000000 - 000000000009e000 (usable)
(XEN) 000000000009e000 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
(XEN) 00000000000e0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
(XEN) 0000000000100000 - 00000000f7fed380 (usable)
(XEN) 00000000f7fed380 - 00000000f7ff0000 (ACPI data)
(XEN) 00000000f7ff0000 - 00000000f8000000 (reserved)
(XEN) 00000000fec00000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved)
(XEN) 0000000100000000 - 0000000108000000 (usable)
(XEN) System RAM: 4095MB (4193836kB)
(XEN) ACPI: RSDP 000FDFC0, 0014 (r0 IBM )
(XEN) ACPI: RSDT F7FEFF80, 002C (r1 IBM SERBLADE 1000 IBM 45444F43)
(XEN) ACPI: FACP F7FEFF00, 0074 (r1 IBM SERBLADE 1000 IBM 45444F43)
(XEN) ACPI: DSDT F7FED380, 2A22 (r1 IBM SERBLADE 1000 INTL 2002025)
(XEN) ACPI: FACS F7FEFE00, 0040
(XEN) ACPI: APIC F7FEFE40, 0092 (r1 IBM SERBLADE 1000 IBM 45444F43)
(XEN) Xen heap: 9MB (9676kB)
(XEN) Domain heap initialised


The system has 4GB and domain0 gets 1GB.

Stefan



xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 09/16/2008 12:58:20 PM:

> Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent by: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> 09/16/2008 12:58 PM
>
> To
>
> Stefan Berger/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> cc
>
> Subject
>
> [Xen-devel] Re: Error while running the xm test suite: Cannot handle
> page request order 0!
>
> Not enough memory?
>
> -- Keir
>
> On 16/9/08 17:33, "Stefan Berger" <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> Hello!
>
> It seems there is an error occurring in the hypervisor while
> running the xm-test suite on an i386 machine:
>
> [...]
> (XEN) Init. ramdisk: c06cb000->c0c3e000
> (XEN) Phys-Mach map: c0c3e000->c0d3e000
> (XEN) Start info: c0d3e000->c0d3e474
> (XEN) Page tables: c0d3f000->c0d4c000
> (XEN) Boot stack: c0d4c000->c0d4d000
> (XEN) TOTAL: c0000000->c1000000
> (XEN) ENTRY ADDRESS: c0100000
> (XEN) Dom0 has maximum 4 VCPUs
> (XEN) Scrubbing Free RAM: .............................done.
> (XEN) Xen trace buffers: disabled
> (XEN) Std. Loglevel: Errors and warnings
> (XEN) Guest Loglevel: Nothing (Rate-limited: Errors and warnings)
> (XEN) Xen is relinquishing VGA console.
> (XEN) *** Serial input -> DOM0 (type 'CTRL-a' three times to switch
> input to Xen)
> (XEN) Freed 100kB init memory.
> (XEN) Cannot handle page request order 0!
> (XEN) Cannot handle page request order 0!
> (XEN) Cannot handle page request order 0!
> (XEN) Cannot handle page request order 0!
> (XEN) Cannot handle page request order 0!
> (XEN) Cannot handle page request order 0!
> (XEN) Cannot handle page request order 0!
> (XEN) Cannot handle page request order 0!
> (XEN) Cannot handle page request order 0!
> (XEN) Cannot handle page request order 0!
> (XEN) Cannot handle page request order 0!
> (XEN) Cannot handle page request order 0!
> (XEN) Cannot handle page request order 0!
> (XEN) Cannot handle page request order 0!
> (XEN) Cannot handle page request order 0!
> (XEN) Cannot handle page request order 0!
> (XEN) Cannot handle page request order 0!
> (XEN) Cannot handle page request order 0!
> (XEN) Cannot handle page request order 0!
> (XEN) Cannot handle page request order 0!
> (XEN) Cannot handle page request order 0!
> (XEN) Cannot handle page request order 0!
>
>
> The results from the test suite look like this on that machine:
>
> FAIL: 02_block_attach_file_device_pos.test
> FAIL: 11_create_concurrent_pos.test
> FAIL: 12_create_concurrent_stress_pos.test
> FAIL: 13_create_multinic_pos.test
> FAIL: 14_create_blockroot_pos.test
> FAIL: 15_create_smallmem_pos.test
> FAIL: 16_create_smallmem_neg.test
> FAIL: 01_destroy_basic_pos.test
> FAIL: 05_destroy_byid_pos.test
> FAIL: 07_destroy_stale_pos.test
> FAIL: 01_enforce_dom0_cpus_basic_pos.test
> FAIL: 05_help_nonroot_pos.test
> FAIL: 04_list_goodparm_pos.test
> FAIL: 06_list_nonroot.test
> FAIL: 01_memset_basic_pos.test
> FAIL: 03_memset_random_pos.test
> FAIL: 04_memset_smallmem_pos.test
> FAIL: 01_migrate_localhost_pos.test
> XFAIL: 02_network_local_ping_pos.test
> FAIL: 03_network_local_tcp_pos.test
> FAIL: 04_network_local_udp_pos.test
> XFAIL: 05_network_dom0_ping_pos.test
> FAIL: 06_network_dom0_tcp_pos.test
> FAIL: 07_network_dom0_udp_pos.test
> XFAIL: 11_network_domU_ping_pos.test
> FAIL: 12_network_domU_tcp_pos.test
> FAIL: 13_network_domU_udp_pos.test
> FAIL: 01_network_attach_pos.test
> FAIL: 02_network_attach_detach_pos.test
> FAIL: 03_network_attach_detach_multiple_pos.test
> FAIL: 01_pause_basic_pos.test
> FAIL: 02_pause_badopt_neg.test
> FAIL: 01_reboot_basic_pos.test
> FAIL: 02_reboot_badopt_neg.test
> FAIL: 01_restore_basic_pos.test
> FAIL: 04_restore_withdevices_pos.test
> FAIL: 01_save_basic_pos.test
> FAIL: 03_save_bogusfile_neg.test
> FAIL: 01_sched_credit_weight_cap_pos.test
> FAIL: 08_security-acm_xapi.test
> FAIL: 01_shutdown_basic_pos.test
> FAIL: 02_shutdown_badparm_neg.test
> FAIL: 02_sysrq_sync_pos.test
> FAIL: 03_sysrq_withreboot_pos.test
> FAIL: 01_unpause_basic_pos.test
> FAIL: 01_vcpu-disable_basic_pos.test
> FAIL: 01_vcpu-pin_basic_pos.test
> SKIP: 01_security-acm_basic.test
> SKIP: 02_security-acm_dom_start.test
> SKIP: 03_security-acm_dom_conflict.test
> SKIP: 04_security-acm_dom_res.test
> SKIP: 05_security-acm_dom_res_conf.test
> SKIP: 06_security-acm_dom_block_attach.test
> SKIP: 07_security-acm_pol_update.test
> SKIP: 09_security-acm_pol_update.test
> SKIP: 10_security-acm_pol_update.test
> SKIP: 01_vtpm-list_pos.test
> SKIP: 02_vtpm-cat_pcrs.test
> SKIP: 03_vtpm-susp_res.test
> SKIP: 04_vtpm-loc_migr.test
> SKIP: 05_vtpm-loc_migr.test
> SKIP: 06_vtpm-susp_res_pcrs.test
> SKIP: 07_vtpm-mig_pcrs.test
> SKIP: 08_vtpm-mig_pcrs.test
> SKIP: 09_vtpm-xapi.test
>
>
> Stefan

> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel <http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel>




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Error while running the xm test suite: Cannot handle page request order 0! , Keir Fraser
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Error while running the xm test suite: Cannot handle page request order 0! , Stefan Berger
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Error while running the xm test suite: Cannot handle page request order 0! , Keir Fraser
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Error while running the xm test suite: Cannot handle page request order 0! , Stefan Berger
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /