On 25/8/08 18:57, "Anthony Liguori" <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Keir Fraser wrote:
>> On 25/8/08 15:15, "Anthony Liguori" <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> With regard to this Xenner patch series, I don't think we have a strong
>> opinion. The changes are not particularly relevant to us. As long as the
>> orthogonal qemu-on-xen modes that we *do* care about can coexist happily
>> alongside, we'll be happy.
>
> Sorry, I was actually referring to the other qemu-dm PV domain support
> patch series. That's the one that I'm looking for input from ya'll on.
> Now that 3.3.0 has been released, it should be possible for you guys to
> consider merging the patches into qemu-dm, right?
We'll certainly be sync'ing with upstream qemu now, yes. I'm not sure what
Ian Jackson's plans are with regard to Gerd's patches. I think he was hoping
that Gerd would post patches to xen-devel against his tree (being an
existing and actively maintained and tested Xen patchset) and then we would
from there submit to upstream. Afaics there's some workflow or patchflow to
be worked out here: I can't see why we would take Gerd's patches wholesale
when we have a working patchset already. It's a bank holiday here in the UK
today, but I expect Ian will give you his opinion tomorrow!
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel