WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3 of 4] xen: allow interrupts to be enabled while

To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@xxxxxxx>, "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3 of 4] xen: allow interrupts to be enabled while doing ablocking spin
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2008年8月21日 08:29:13 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2008年8月21日 00:28:35 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <af2a7805bbb84b3843b8.1219276940@localhost >
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <patchbomb.1219276937@localhost > <af2a7805bbb84b3843b8.1219276940@localhost >
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> 21.08.08 02:02 >>>
If spin_lock is called in an interrupts-enabled context, we can safely
enable interrupts while spinning. We don't bother for the actual spin
loop, but if we timeout and fall back to blocking, it's definitely
worthwhile enabling interrupts if possible.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
--- a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 u32 taken_slow_nested;
 u32 taken_slow_pickup;
 u32 taken_slow_spurious;
+ u32 taken_slow_irqenable;
 
 u64 released;
 u32 released_slow;
@@ -167,12 +168,13 @@
 __get_cpu_var(lock_spinners) = prev;
 }
 
-static noinline int xen_spin_lock_slow(struct raw_spinlock *lock)
+static noinline int xen_spin_lock_slow(struct raw_spinlock *lock, bool 
irq_enable)
 {
 struct xen_spinlock *xl = (struct xen_spinlock *)lock;
 struct xen_spinlock *prev;
 int irq = __get_cpu_var(lock_kicker_irq);
 int ret;
+ unsigned long flags;
 
 /* If kicker interrupts not initialized yet, just spin */
 if (irq == -1)
@@ -180,6 +182,12 @@
 
 /* announce we're spinning */
 prev = spinning_lock(xl);
+
+ flags = __raw_local_save_flags();
+ if (irq_enable) {
+ ADD_STATS(taken_slow_irqenable, 1);
+ raw_local_irq_enable();
+ }
 
 ADD_STATS(taken_slow, 1);
 ADD_STATS(taken_slow_nested, prev != NULL);
@@ -220,11 +228,12 @@
 kstat_irqs_this_cpu(irq_to_desc(irq))++;
 
 out:
+ raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 unspinning_lock(xl, prev);
 return ret;
 }
 
-static void xen_spin_lock(struct raw_spinlock *lock)
+static inline void __xen_spin_lock(struct raw_spinlock *lock, bool irq_enable)
 {
 struct xen_spinlock *xl = (struct xen_spinlock *)lock;
 unsigned timeout;
@@ -254,9 +263,21 @@
 : "memory");
 
 spin_time_accum_fast(start_spin_fast);
- } while (unlikely(oldval != 0 && (TIMEOUT == ~0 || 
!xen_spin_lock_slow(lock))));
+
+ } while (unlikely(oldval != 0 &&
+ (TIMEOUT == ~0 || !xen_spin_lock_slow(lock, 
irq_enable))));
 
 spin_time_accum(start_spin);
+}
+
+static void xen_spin_lock(struct raw_spinlock *lock)
+{
+ __xen_spin_lock(lock, false);
+}
+
+static void xen_spin_lock_flags(struct raw_spinlock *lock, unsigned long flags)
+{
+ __xen_spin_lock(lock, !raw_irqs_disabled_flags(flags));
 }
 
 static noinline void xen_spin_unlock_slow(struct xen_spinlock *xl)
@@ -323,6 +344,7 @@
 pv_lock_ops.spin_is_locked = xen_spin_is_locked;
 pv_lock_ops.spin_is_contended = xen_spin_is_contended;
 pv_lock_ops.spin_lock = xen_spin_lock;
+ pv_lock_ops.spin_lock_flags = xen_spin_lock_flags;
 pv_lock_ops.spin_trylock = xen_spin_trylock;
 pv_lock_ops.spin_unlock = xen_spin_unlock;
 }
@@ -353,6 +375,8 @@
 &spinlock_stats.taken_slow_pickup);
 debugfs_create_u32("taken_slow_spurious", 0444, d_spin_debug,
 &spinlock_stats.taken_slow_spurious);
+ debugfs_create_u32("taken_slow_irqenable", 0444, d_spin_debug,
+ &spinlock_stats.taken_slow_irqenable);
 
 debugfs_create_u64("released", 0444, d_spin_debug, 
&spinlock_stats.released);
 debugfs_create_u32("released_slow", 0444, d_spin_debug,
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] xen: save previous spinlock when blocking , Jan Beulich
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] trigger an interrupt in HVM , Keir Fraser
Previous by Thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3 of 4] xen: allow interrupts to be enabled while doing a blocking spin , Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Next by Thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4 of 4] xen: measure how long spinlocks spend blocking , Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /