WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

[Xen-devel] Re: Xen performance and Dbench

To: deshantm@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen performance and Dbench
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2008年8月07日 14:49:50 -0500
Cc: "dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Xen-Devel \(E-mail\)" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2008年8月07日 12:51:18 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1e16a9ed0808071210u4a18ada1i54507ebdab7057a7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20080807111850562.00000008444@djm-pc > <1e16a9ed0808071210u4a18ada1i54507ebdab7057a7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501)
Todd Deshane wrote:
dbench is an interesting test since it is basically an I/O test (Samba test)
http://samba.org/ftp/tridge/dbench/README
dbench is actually *not* an I/O test. It mostly stresses a filesystems interaction with the page cache. It's heavily threaded and tends to scale okay but it's rarely impacted heavily by the underlying storage systems I/O performance. It tends to demonstrate shadow page table SMP scalability more than I/O performance. The OLS paper referenced really had bad methodologies. If you read carefully, their host system was a 2-way system. They ran all of the guests UP though. Since they didn't do a parallel make, it wasn't very obvious for their "kernel build" but it became obvious with dbench since there were multiple threads. So native and "VServer" had access to both CPU cores whereas Xen, KVM, et al were only running on a single core. There's no way dbench is 30% of native under Xen. That should have been a big red flag that something was wrong.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
I don't know if dbench is the best test to determine if Xen (or other
virts) need
to be fixed.
Cheers,
Todd
===================================
Thanks... for the memory
I really could use more / My throughput's on the floor
The balloon is flat / My swap disk's fat / I've OOM's in store
Overcommitted so much
(with apologies to the late great Bob Hope)
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen performance and Dbench , Todd Deshane
Next by Date: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH][RFC] 3/3 Fix [ia64] PV driver domains - ugly python hacks , Alex Williamson
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen performance and Dbench , Todd Deshane
Next by Thread: [Xen-devel] RE: Xen performance and Dbench , Dan Magenheimer
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /