WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

[Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu

To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 14:39:03 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, Anthony Liguori <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2008年8月06日 06:40:08 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4899A617.6040506@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony Liguori <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <48973F8E.8080109@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080805104630.GM4478@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <489835A3.6030804@xxxxxxxxxx> <20080805112935.GO4478@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48985336.2020709@xxxxxxxxxx> <20080805150328.GT4478@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080805154140.GV4478@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48997981.1030703@xxxxxxxxxx> <20080806102338.GA4448@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4899A617.6040506@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006年07月14日
Gerd Hoffmann, le Wed 06 Aug 2008 15:24:39 +0200, a écrit :
> > You forgot the _test_ stage. You are basically asking us to replace our
> > well-tested implementation with your implementation, that's quite a
> > move.
>
> Sure, and more will follow.
But by having it merged into just upstream qemu you won't magically get
Xen people actually test it, so it would be mostly dead code.
> Pretty much like upstreaming the xen support into the linux kernel.
There's a big difference here. The upstream linux kernel merge won't be
merged back to the linux-2.6.18 tree. And people do test upstream xen
support.
Samuel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] rendezvous-based local time calibration WOW! , John Levon
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] Xen interrupt latency measure? , Dan Magenheimer
Previous by Thread: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu , Gerd Hoffmann
Next by Thread: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu , Gerd Hoffmann
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /