Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 8/4/08, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> +const unsigned char atkbd_set2_keycode[512] = {
>
> Missing "static"?
Yep, I'll fix it up.
>> + for (i = 0; i < 128; i++) {
>> + scancode2linux[i] = atkbd_set2_keycode[atkbd_unxlate_table[i]];
>> + scancode2linux[i | 0x80] =
>> + atkbd_set2_keycode[atkbd_unxlate_table[i] | 0x80];
>> + }
>
> Can't these table be calculated so that this initial run-time lookup
> is not needed?
Should be doable, yes.
> The framebuffer does not use dirty memory detection. Is this
> intentional? I understand that in Xen that's not possible.
The guest frontend driver does that and sends the info to the backend
driver (XENFB_TYPE_UPDATE messages).
cheers,
 Gerd
-- 
http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/xenner/
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel