WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Add MSI support to XEN

To: "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>, Espen Skoglund <espen.skoglund@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Shan, Haitao" <haitao.shan@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Add MSI support to XEN
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2008年3月31日 15:33:48 +0100
Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2008年3月31日 07:35:14 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <391BF3CDD2DC0848B40ACB72FA97AD590323064B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AciQMO1Y+dTIVbdxTuGacqzZj4GuywARL6KAAAvIwN8AALvKIAADJmsgAAB3TPAAn7fz4AABG9/OAABJeBAAAGRHOw==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Add MSI support to XEN
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122
On 31/3/08 15:25, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> So, if you leave the driver as it is (triggering the software LSC
>> interrupt), do APIC EOI in Xen before executing the interrupt
>> handler in
>> dom0, and do not mask the MSI at all, then you no longer hang?
>
> I usuually do experiement in linux kernel, and it no longer hang.
Well, I'd be okay with an initial implementation which does not allow Xen to
mask MSIs. But still I think it will be cleaner and more extensible to have
Xen program the MSI registers anyway. This will hide details like interrupt
vector, APIC destination mode, etc. from the MSI-capable guest, and also
will make it easier to support things like changing interrupt affinity on
the fly (since it will not be necessary to get dom0 involved in that).
Once you have Xen able to write the MSI registers, I suppose it is not much
extra work to implement some kind of interrupt mitigation scheme involving
mask/enable bits of the MSI configuration register.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Add MSI support to XEN , Jiang, Yunhong
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] Add XSPolicy.can_run check to Xen-API , Stefan Berger
Previous by Thread: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Add MSI support to XEN , Jiang, Yunhong
Next by Thread: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Add MSI support to XEN , Shan, Haitao
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /