WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] grant tables and HVM+PV

To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] grant tables and HVM+PV
From: John Levon <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2008年3月28日 17:07:30 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2008年3月28日 10:08:38 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C412D555.1E891%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20080328165022.GA21681@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C412D555.1E891%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 05:03:17PM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:
> > Has broken our HVM PV drivers. Previously we were using:
> > 
> > 520 if ((HYPERVISOR_grant_table_op(GNTTABOP_setup_table, pset, 1) !=
> > 0) ||
> > 521 (pset->status != 0)) {
> > 
> > even on HVM. Now, this isn't actually necessary (stuff works fine with
> > the call nop'd out, presumably due to the auto-sizing), but I wonder why the
> > only grant op allowed is _query_size? IE what's the status of grant
> > table code on HVM/PV? Is it just disabled because no compat audit has
> > been done, or what?
>
> Most of the mapping calls wouldn't work at all.
OK. I think we were effectively ending up with a call that did nothing
but did it quietly and now we're getting back (the correct) ENOSYS.
Clearly our bug but it wasn't quite obvious what was supposed to work.
> Query_size() could probably be simply given a stub implementation for
> HVM that returns all is good.
It already is, I think?
regards
john
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] actually check for errors in bdrv_flush et al , Ian Jackson
Next by Date: RE: [Xen-devel] pci pass-through, NIC card , Kay, Allen M
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] grant tables and HVM+PV , Keir Fraser
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] grant tables and HVM+PV , Keir Fraser
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /