WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue

To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue
From: Kouya Shimura <kouya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2008年3月25日 19:54:20 +0900
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2008年3月25日 03:54:47 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C40D3B88.15566%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <7k4pawfnxs.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C40D3B88.15566%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Keir Fraser writes:
> However in this case I guess the IDE/SCSI device model could allow
> asynchronous reporting of flush completion to the guest, and this new aspect
> of the device model would obviously tie into your patch, being done on
> aio_fsync_cb().
Here is a revised patch. Is this a good fix?
I'm not an expert on the SCSI. So please excuse
the SCSI side is not implemented yet.
(I tried but it doesn't work well)
Thanks,
Kouya
Signed-off-by: Kouya Shimura <kouya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
diff -r 76c9cf11ce23 tools/ioemu/block-raw.c
--- a/tools/ioemu/block-raw.c Fri Mar 21 09:45:34 2008 +0000
+++ b/tools/ioemu/block-raw.c Tue Mar 25 19:40:42 2008 +0900
@@ -606,6 +606,18 @@ static void raw_flush(BlockDriverState *
 fsync(s->fd);
 }
 
+void bdrv_aio_flush(BlockDriverState *bs, 
+ BlockDriverCompletionFunc *cb, void *opaque)
+{
+ RawAIOCB *acb;
+
+ acb = raw_aio_setup(bs, 0, NULL, 0, cb, opaque);
+ if (!acb)
+ return;
+ if (aio_fsync(O_SYNC, &acb->aiocb) < 0)
+ qemu_aio_release(acb);
+}
+
 BlockDriver bdrv_raw = {
 "raw",
 sizeof(BDRVRawState),
diff -r 76c9cf11ce23 tools/ioemu/hw/ide.c
--- a/tools/ioemu/hw/ide.c Fri Mar 21 09:45:34 2008 +0000
+++ b/tools/ioemu/hw/ide.c Tue Mar 25 19:40:42 2008 +0900
@@ -1738,6 +1738,13 @@ static void ide_clear_hob(IDEState *ide_
 ide_if[1].select &= ~(1 << 7);
 }
 
+static void ide_flush_cb(void *opaque, int ret)
+{
+ IDEState *s = (IDEState *)opaque;
+ s->status = READY_STAT;
+ ide_set_irq(s);
+}
+
 static void ide_ioport_write(void *opaque, uint32_t addr, uint32_t val)
 {
 IDEState *ide_if = opaque;
@@ -1976,10 +1983,13 @@ static void ide_ioport_write(void *opaqu
 break;
 case WIN_FLUSH_CACHE:
 case WIN_FLUSH_CACHE_EXT:
- if (s->bs)
- bdrv_flush(s->bs);
- s->status = READY_STAT;
- ide_set_irq(s);
+ if (s->bs) {
+ bdrv_aio_flush(s->bs, ide_flush_cb, s);
+ s->status = BUSY_STAT;
+ } else {
+ s->status = READY_STAT;
+ ide_set_irq(s);
+ }
 break;
 case WIN_IDLEIMMEDIATE:
 case WIN_STANDBY:
diff -r 76c9cf11ce23 tools/ioemu/vl.h
--- a/tools/ioemu/vl.h Fri Mar 21 09:45:34 2008 +0000
+++ b/tools/ioemu/vl.h Tue Mar 25 19:40:42 2008 +0900
@@ -653,6 +653,8 @@ BlockDriverAIOCB *bdrv_aio_write(BlockDr
 const uint8_t *buf, int nb_sectors,
 BlockDriverCompletionFunc *cb, void *opaque);
 void bdrv_aio_cancel(BlockDriverAIOCB *acb);
+void bdrv_aio_flush(BlockDriverState *bs, 
+ BlockDriverCompletionFunc *cb, void *opaque);
 
 void qemu_aio_init(void);
 void qemu_aio_poll(void);
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] where is writable page table implemented? , Tim Deegan
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue , Keir Fraser
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue , Keir Fraser
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue , Keir Fraser
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /