WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] arp reply for migration

To: tgh <wwwwww4187@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] arp reply for migration
From: Daniel Stodden <stodden@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2008年3月09日 10:41:02 +0100
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2008年3月09日 01:41:40 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <47D38A12.4010507@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Fakultät für Informatik I10, Technische Universität München
References: <C3F56A58.14D57%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47D38A12.4010507@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 2008年03月09日 at 14:56 +0800, tgh wrote:
> hi
> I read the live migration paper,and in the paper,"...generate an 
> unsolicited ARP reply from the migrated host",and which is the migrated 
> host? source physical node,or destination physical node,or VM?and i 
> guess ,it is destination physical node, is it right? if it is, then when 
> is the ARP reply generated ?after the guestOS has been resumed or when ? 
> i did not find the code for it ? could you help me
It is certainly sent fron the destination host, i.e. after migration.
The purpose is to let peers (i.e. hosts to which connections (e.g. on
the ip layer) are maintained across the migration phase) know that the
destination hardware address (i.e. on the mac layer) has changed. 
Even if you don't change the mac address, as the paper suggests, you
would still need to send -something- in order to let switches learn that
the migrated guest has been moved to a different physical port on that
switch.
If you don't understand this, I suggest to get yourself a book on the
topic. See e.g. page 62 in
http://books.google.com/books?id=-btNds68w84C
regards,
daniel
-- 
Daniel Stodden
LRR - Lehrstuhl für Rechnertechnik und Rechnerorganisation
Institut für Informatik der TU München D-85748 Garching
http://www.lrr.in.tum.de/~stodden mailto:stodden@xxxxxxxxxx
PGP Fingerprint: F5A4 1575 4C56 E26A 0B33 3D80 457E 82AE B0D8 735B
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] about network live connection during migration , Daniel Stodden
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 37, Issue 44 , Pavel Muller
Previous by Thread: [Xen-devel] arp reply for migration , tgh
Next by Thread: RE: [Xen-devel] RE: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] , Santos, Jose Renato G
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /