> This kind of suggests that we should be plumbing things through to the
> guest with a granularity of whole targets, rather than individual
> logical units. The alternative is a much more complicated scsi
> emulation which can fix up the LUN-sensitive commands.
I think we should probably have the option of doing either.
> Allowing this kind of mapping sounds reasonable to me. It would also
> make it possible (hopefully) to add support for some of the weirder
> SCSI logical unit addressing modes without changing the frontends
> (e.g. hierarchical addressing with 64 bit LUNs). That might involve a
> certain amount of munging of REPORT LUNS commands in the backend,
> though.
Not sure how much it matters, but any 'munging' of scsi commands would
be a real drag for Windows drivers. The Windows SCSI layer is very
strict on lots of things, and is a real pain if you are not talking to a
physical PCI scsi device.
James
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel