WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Xen-devel] Dynamic-irq's in HVM domains

To: "Mark Williamson" <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Dynamic-irq's in HVM domains
From: "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 09:00:06 +1100
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2007年11月30日 14:00:49 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200711301857.44555.mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D0131A1B1@trantor > <1196415224.21533.24.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D0131A2E1@trantor > <200711301857.44555.mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcgzgwwmrC7az2BhRrCKL5H3Mn6zAQAGO3NA
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Dynamic-irq's in HVM domains
> Doesn't windows have some kind of deferred work processing like Linux
> softirqs
> or workqueues that you could used to schedule work to happen soon in
> driver
> context? That'd enable you to do everything within existing windows
APIs.
Yes, but all scsiport calls have to be done from within the context of
the scsiport code. Aside from the request processing path where you get
a new srb (scsi request block) to process, you have two choices - the
isr, and a timer callback. Performance with the timer callback is
horrible, for obvious reasons. An isr has to be hooked to an actual irq.
Therein lies the problem...
The more I read about this the more I find other people looking for the
same sort of solution... I may have to abandon the whole scsiport idea,
which would be a shame.
Thanks
James
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: [Xen-devel] Incorrect update_va_mapping call in interface.tex (Interface Manual). , Bruce Montague
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RFC] Gdbserver-xen support for HVM Guests... getting further. , Zulauf, John
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Dynamic-irq's in HVM domains , Mark Williamson
Next by Thread: [Xen-devel] Invoking blkback_probe , Kaushikb
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /