WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel][VTD] 1:1 mapping for dom0 exhausts xenheap on x86/32 wit

To: "Han, Weidong" <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel][VTD] 1:1 mapping for dom0 exhausts xenheap on x86/32 with 4G memory
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2007年9月28日 07:41:55 +0100
Cc: "Kay, Allen M" <allen.m.kay@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2007年9月27日 23:37:40 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <08DF4D958216244799FC84F3514D70F00ABA9C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcgBkBj9hxSsSLqpQVyYGgB006zGCwACo/mR
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel][VTD] 1:1 mapping for dom0 exhausts xenheap on x86/32 with 4G memory
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.6.070618
alloc_domheap_page() instead of alloc_xenheap_page(), and use
map_domain_page() to get temporary mappings when you need them. This costs
nothing on x86/64, where all memory is permanently mapped. Or it is *very*
reasonable to only support vt-d on x86/64 hypervisor. That's the
configuration we care about by far the most, since 32-bit guests run fine on
a 64-bit hypervisor, and of course all vt-d systems will be 64-bit capable.
 -- Keir
On 28/9/07 06:26, "Han, Weidong" <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> xenheap size is 9M on x86/32 xen, it's not enough to setup 1:1 page
> tables for dom0. It causes dom0 cannot boot successfully. Setup 1:1 page
> table in domheap still might be a problem since the thinking is to use
> the same 1:1 page table for both dom0 and PV domains. Currently I think
> of two options: 1) go back to original method, that's to say setup page
> table dynamically for dom0; 2) increase xenheap size on x86/32. How do
> you think about? Thanks.
>
> Weidong
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: [Xen-devel][VTD] 1:1 mapping for dom0 exhausts xenheap on x86/32 with 4G memory , Han, Weidong
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] fix migration from NX-capable machine to non-NX-capable machine , Keir Fraser
Previous by Thread: [Xen-devel][VTD] 1:1 mapping for dom0 exhausts xenheap on x86/32 with 4G memory , Han, Weidong
Next by Thread: RE: [Xen-devel][VTD] 1:1 mapping for dom0 exhausts xenheap on x86/32 with 4G memory , Han, Weidong
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /