On 27/9/07 17:56, "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Is the 3.1.1 release intended to be hypervisor ABI compatible with the
> 3.1.0 release ? ie can I expect the 3.1.1 userspace bits to work reliably
> on a 3.1.0 hypervisor, or vica-verca.
>
> A quick test shows I can start XenD & launch guests with a 3.1.1 XenD
> on a 3.1.0 hypervisor. I'm wondering if this is just luck that will soon
> fail me, or a intended result ?
>
> If hypervisor ABI compatability for minor point releases is intended this
> would make me very happy because it removes a huge upgrade headache. We
> have traditionally not been able to push out the Xen minor point releases
> as update errata to Fedora distros because of the need to lock-step upgrade
> the hypervisor at the same time as the userspace.
I can happily tell you that the tools ABI is stable for minor point
releases. At least, that is our intention (we don't automatically test it).
By the way, I guess I'll push your xend patches into -rc3 if they seem well
behaved in -unstable after a few days.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel