| To: | "Kay, Allen M" <allen.m.kay@xxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] [VTD-NEO][patch 0/6] Intel VT-d/Neocleus 1:1 mreged code for PCI passthrough |
| From: | Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2007年9月11日 13:49:50 +0100 |
| Cc: | Guy Zana <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | 2007年9月11日 05:50:29 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <13A2F7DE1BAEA345A61DD40F303ED7A667D9DD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcfvUPA+fwPVGW6LTE+QIE4aSL5IWQFIU1Uo |
| Thread-topic: | [Xen-devel] [VTD-NEO][patch 0/6] Intel VT-d/Neocleus 1:1 mreged code for PCI passthrough |
| User-agent: | Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.6.070618 |
On 5/9/07 01:08, "Kay, Allen M" <allen.m.kay@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The following 6 patches contains merge of Intel VT-d and Neocleus' 1:1 > mapping patches for enabling HVM guest direct device access that were > last submitted around end of May. These patches applied cleanly to > changeset 15730. The 'include' patch doesn't apply any more, and in any case needs splitting up logically (vtd bits go in vtd patch; neo bits in neo patch; any generic bits in xen patch). The 'pt' (neo) code looks to throw way too much stuff in include/xen/ of which I suspect most is private definitions that really belong in the pt/ directory. Also consider which bits should be in include/asm rather than include/xen. The presence of the E820_1TO1 stuff makes me suspect that the 1:1 area allocation hasn't been cleaned up as much as it should have been. There shouldn't be any need to modify Xen's permanent e820 map I think. Haven't looked any further at the Xen parts, but I'll take a look at the tools patch... -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Xen-devel] xs transaction , Tian, Kevin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Regression in serial console on ia64 , Markus Armbruster |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [VTD-NEO][patch 0/6] Intel VT-d/Neocleus 1:1 mreged code for PCI passthrough , John Byrne |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [VTD-NEO][patch 0/6] Intel VT-d/Neocleus 1:1 mreged code for PCI passthrough , Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |