WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

[Xen-devel] LVM/DRBD8/Xen - issue(s) in block-IO implementation?

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] LVM/DRBD8/Xen - issue(s) in block-IO implementation?
From: Peter Siering <lists@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 12:41:46 +0200
Delivery-date: 2007年9月07日 03:42:19 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
while trying to use Xen, DRBD and LVM together I came across a nasty issue with the following error message "bio would need to, but cannot, be split". It happens if one starts a LVM-based DomU. There have been some postings regarding the same issue on the xen- users-list, but none of the developers ever commented on those. So I would like to draw some attention to this issue on the developer list ;-).
It's perfectly described in the following posting:
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2007-08/msg00338.html
I can add, that Xen and DRBD and LVM did run without such problems while using Xen 3.0.3 (Debian) and DRBD8, but started showing the issue with Xen 3.1. The message just appears if one uses LVM volumes on DRBD devices as "phy:"-disks; if you mark such devices with "tap:" it works. The DRBD developers point to Xen for fixing the issue. There are two threads which may lead in the right direction for someone familiar with block-IO in Xen:
http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/2007-April/006728.html
http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/2007-August/007269.html
http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/2007-August/007270.html (just a followup to the former)
Thanks in advance for looking into it.
Peter
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix one dead loop case in host S3 , Tian, Kevin
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] LVM/DRBD8/Xen - issue(s) in block-IO implementation? , Keir Fraser
Previous by Thread: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] [HVM] NUMA support in HVM guests , Xu, Anthony
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] LVM/DRBD8/Xen - issue(s) in block-IO implementation? , Keir Fraser
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /