Host: Unisys ES7000/one, x86_64, 48 processors, 160 GB RAM

xen-unstable changeset 15730 compiled with max_phys_cpus=64 andbooted with dom0_mem=512M numa=on

NEW ISSUE:

• Bug #1049 - When boot the host with more than 166 GB RAM, the host only sees a maximum of 166GB

OLD ISSUES:

• Bug #1050 - after c/s 15203, networking does not work unless a default gateway is specified
• Bug #1051 - after c/s 15203, all xm-test tests fail with XmTestLib.NetConfig.NetworkError: Failed to show vif0.0 aliases: 65280 – workaround is to comment out lines in cleanDom0Aliases in xm-test/lib/XmTestLib/NetConfig.py until xm-test code is changed to accommodate the new bridge naming scheme
• Bug #940 - Must specify hpet=disable kernel parameter to get 32-bit SLES10 domVTs to boot; narrowed down to c/s 14436 but the patch originator cannot recreate on his hardware
• Bug #1037 - Shutdown of large domains takes a long time, during which time dom0 is not interruptible (due to the synchronous tearing down of the memory map)

Testing includes running xm-test and also attempting to boot and run programs in the following domUs and domVTs (running domains #s 3 through 9 simultaneously):

1. 32-processor 64-bit SLES10 domU with 156gb memory – run kernbench optimal load

2. 32-processor 64-bit SLES10 domVT with 150gb memory – run kernbench optimal load

3. 4-processor 64-bit SLES10 domU with 16gb memory - run kernbench optimal load

4. 4-procesor 32-bit SLES10 domVT with 2gb memory (booted with hpet=disable) - run kernbench optimal load

5. 4-processor 32-bit PAE SLES10 domVT with 16gb memory (booted with hpet=disable) - run kernbench optimal load

6. 4-processor 64-bit SLES10 domVT with 16gb memory – run kernbench optimal load

7. 1-processor Windows XP domVT with 4gb memory – run 100% cpu intensive program

8. 1-processor Windows 2003 Server domVT with 4gb memory – run 100% cpu intensive program

9. 8-processor Windows 2003 Enterprise Edition domVT with 16gb memory – run 100% cpu intensive program

Results:

All domains ran successfully.

Ran xm-test (DomU) on dom0 with the following results:

(Could only run after commenting out the call to cleanDom0Aliases in xm-test/lib/XmTestLib/NetConfig.py and most of the failures are related to not finding device vif0.0 – this was not necessary before c/s 15203)

Xm-test timing summary:

Run Started : 2007年8月23日 16:13:35 -0400

Run Stoped : 2007年8月23日 16:48:29 -0400

Xm-test execution summary:

PASS: 102

FAIL: 10

XPASS: 0

XFAIL: 3

Details:

FAIL: 13_create_multinic_pos

Unknown reason

XFAIL: 02_network_local_ping_pos

Unknown reason

FAIL: 03_network_local_tcp_pos

Unknown reason

FAIL: 04_network_local_udp_pos

Unknown reason

XFAIL: 05_network_dom0_ping_pos

Unknown reason

FAIL: 06_network_dom0_tcp_pos

Unknown reason

FAIL: 07_network_dom0_udp_pos

Unknown reason

XFAIL: 11_network_domU_ping_pos

Unknown reason

FAIL: 12_network_domU_tcp_pos

Unknown reason

FAIL: 13_network_domU_udp_pos

Unknown reason

Thanks,

Sue Krysan

Linux Systems Group

Unisys Corporation