WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] PATCH: 0/10: Merge xenfb & xenconsoled into qemu-dm

To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] PATCH: 0/10: Merge xenfb & xenconsoled into qemu-dm
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2007年8月18日 11:11:20 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2007年8月18日 03:08:02 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20070817201228.GD707@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcfhgB9EXaNgok1zEdyn3QAWy6hiGQ==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] PATCH: 0/10: Merge xenfb & xenconsoled into qemu-dm
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.3.061214
On 17/8/07 21:12, "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Thinking about this, I think I can easily re-work the last two patches so
>> that xenconsoled will continue to process the guest consoles, if-and-only-if
>> the guest doesn't have a QEMU instance already doing it. That would give us
>> choice between both deployment scenarios per-guest.
>
> I've got this working ok - since both xenconsoled and qemu-dm are already
> reading the /local/domain/<id>/console/ path in xenstore, I simply added
> an extra field 'use-device-model' which can be 1 or 0. If XenD sees that
> a PV domain has a device model then it sets it to 1, causing xenconsoled
> to ignore that guest. I'll post patches to this effect over the weekend
Sounds basically good, but a field called 'type' in the backend xenstore
directory would be more flexible and more consistent with other backend
directory contents (at least netback's). We could use values 'ioemu' and
'xenconsoled', and absence of the field implies xenconsoled. Both ioemu and
xenconsoled should check the field.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] complicated migration problem , Keir Fraser
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Xen i386 xen-head.S fix sections mixup , Mathieu Desnoyers
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] PATCH: 0/10: Merge xenfb & xenconsoled into qemu-dm , Daniel P. Berrange
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] PATCH: 0/10: Merge xenfb & xenconsoled into qemu-dm , Daniel P. Berrange
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /