| To: | "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] PATCH: 0/10: Merge xenfb & xenconsoled into qemu-dm |
| From: | Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2007年8月18日 11:11:20 +0100 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | 2007年8月18日 03:08:02 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20070817201228.GD707@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcfhgB9EXaNgok1zEdyn3QAWy6hiGQ== |
| Thread-topic: | [Xen-devel] PATCH: 0/10: Merge xenfb & xenconsoled into qemu-dm |
| User-agent: | Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.3.061214 |
On 17/8/07 21:12, "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Thinking about this, I think I can easily re-work the last two patches so >> that xenconsoled will continue to process the guest consoles, if-and-only-if >> the guest doesn't have a QEMU instance already doing it. That would give us >> choice between both deployment scenarios per-guest. > > I've got this working ok - since both xenconsoled and qemu-dm are already > reading the /local/domain/<id>/console/ path in xenstore, I simply added > an extra field 'use-device-model' which can be 1 or 0. If XenD sees that > a PV domain has a device model then it sets it to 1, causing xenconsoled > to ignore that guest. I'll post patches to this effect over the weekend Sounds basically good, but a field called 'type' in the backend xenstore directory would be more flexible and more consistent with other backend directory contents (at least netback's). We could use values 'ioemu' and 'xenconsoled', and absence of the field implies xenconsoled. Both ioemu and xenconsoled should check the field. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] complicated migration problem , Keir Fraser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Xen i386 xen-head.S fix sections mixup , Mathieu Desnoyers |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] PATCH: 0/10: Merge xenfb & xenconsoled into qemu-dm , Daniel P. Berrange |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] PATCH: 0/10: Merge xenfb & xenconsoled into qemu-dm , Daniel P. Berrange |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |