| To: | "Ian Campbell" <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] [Q]Xen 3.1 kernel config surprises!! |
| From: | "pradeep singh rautela" <rautelap@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2007年8月17日 18:17:26 +0530 |
| Cc: | xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | 2007年8月17日 05:47:47 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=n/AhoSuFJjMfld2awBB0ZMJApgqJS4C84L7q+IBkQAH+MhDlXxNh0ayKvYpB/BhKHPQ6SdS++5B+9Z898ByD2BpjIhDI3QxIXK4jdFBJ951qQdAchv4MuivZ/Jwor7/pRaF9zL92oCclNjkqR9r1MGYWqPoHFp2Iwa+JWytgPTU= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=reKU6DHWgY/dcelYh8sQYoLC+uFMx/h9/5Dyy6yEpCXpFvBRcCZ5NlsLrEEygGEj8QMrg40f0ZYl/WOq80tOCNsSKJhdUO9x4n1uhfFBpdfGJy9nVzr5bbMchVojKWs9TKfIU8/LBjZ3JJksHnmjIKkMu4Iu3niRjnxvvxHAskU= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1187353876.27480.58.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <6bc632150708170224t65c34694u6d3f21daa21614aa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1187353876.27480.58.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 8/17/07, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2007年08月17日 at 14:54 +0530, pradeep singh rautela wrote: [snip] > > No, this seems to have been broken when the kernel was upgraded to > 2.6.18 (i.e. frickin' ages ago!). It seems that "make oldconfig" doesn't > create include/linux/autoconf.h anymore and that "make silentoldconfig" > is required instead. We use include/linux/autoconfig.h as the makefile > stamp to indicate whether to write an initial configuration or not. > > Can you try > http://xenbits.xensource.com/staging/xen-unstable.hg?rev/ae923d1f50bf Sure Ian. How much does this affects xen-3.1 release? thanks Ian. --pradeep > > Ian. > > > -- -- pradeep singh rautela "Genius is 1% inspiration, and 99% perspiration" - not me :) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [Q]Xen 3.1 kernel config surprises!! , Ian Campbell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [Q]Xen 3.1 kernel config surprises!! , Mats Petersson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [Q]Xen 3.1 kernel config surprises!! , Ian Campbell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [Q]Xen 3.1 kernel config surprises!! , Mats Petersson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |