* Randy Dunlap (randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On 2007年8月13日 11:55:36 -0700 Chris Wright wrote:
> > * joe@xxxxxxxxxxx (joe@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > > +F: arch/i386/xen/
> > > +F: drivers/*/xen-*front.c
> > > +F: drivers/xen/
> > > +F: include/asm-i386/xen/
> > > +F: include/xen/
> > 
> > I think this data will easily become stale. What is the point again?
>
> Agreed. But not everyone wants to or should have to use git,
> so what are the alternatives?
Between git (or gitweb), existing MAINTAINERS and a bit of common
sense (or extra sleuthing), I never perceived a significant problem.
Alternative could be to place info directly in source files. If not
all of MAINTAINERS info, it could be a tag to reference the relevant
MAINTAINERS entry.
thanks,
-chris
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel