WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] boot a existing windows in hvm domain

To: "Keir Fraser" <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] boot a existing windows in hvm domain
From: "Brady Chen" <chenchp@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 16:22:12 +0800
Cc: tygrawy@xxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Z24 <z24@xxxxxxx>, AL.LINUX@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2007年8月07日 01:19:47 -0700
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=usbWJ5vr7IwBOzWppZ+pJScUp4mxaWka3sFLsj955Uld36D1rlXjihVqYxBO+qHCMoYx3lUQCRphZ1L+FqAHBsEE5Afcy+AlzdZpy6lS/tElSAsxX+TNSTIWMsc7Gp+x0xyQ0M35PlFMLvo6iuRm7UkcmZWXNUr/tPNpN4eZgbA=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=F/DbWL7BMkmJgq+fiJ32Wdo9xfdyhQY0RfrTjGlX5SXf762eSR+TK5y0niypuML7HnaaK16w4cN/mck0OZgYap2H2a3fIrXpa1+UUbRAeybNN48YTMeMoZPExtJjP8VHLQDS+VKOeRUvAPcNVBnPWS3bzr3gf+GtmSKgMZZUvZA=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C2DDE5B0.13AB1%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <8fec1fce0708070058u87530f5la63481b422e2da2e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C2DDE5B0.13AB1%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi, here the output, you could get the whole dump from the attachment
of my last mail.
so, there should be a non-support instruction in 0xd0900 or 0xd0800?
thanks
 d07ec: 8d 04 16 lea (%esi,%edx,1),%eax
 d07ef: e9 2f ff ff ff jmp d0723 <address+0x23>
 d07f4: 8b 55 08 mov 0x8(%ebp),%edx
 d07f7: 89 f8 mov %edi,%eax
 d07f9: 8b 5d f4 mov 0xfffffff4(%ebp),%ebx
 d07fc: 8b 75 f8 mov 0xfffffff8(%ebp),%esi
 d07ff: 25 ff ff 00 00 and 0ドルxffff,%eax
 d0804: 8b 7d fc mov 0xfffffffc(%ebp),%edi
 d0807: 89 ec mov %ebp,%esp
 d0809: c1 e0 04 shl 0ドルx4,%eax
 d080c: 01 d0 add %edx,%eax
 d08e6: 8b 56 2c mov 0x2c(%esi),%edx
 d08e9: 89 f0 mov %esi,%eax
 d08eb: 89 1c 24 mov %ebx,(%esp)
 d08ee: e8 0d fe ff ff call d0700 <address>
 d08f3: 89 5c 24 0c mov %ebx,0xc(%esp)
 d08f7: 8b 56 2c mov 0x2c(%esi),%edx
 d08fa: 89 44 24 04 mov %eax,0x4(%esp)
 d08fe: c7 04 24 2e 4b 0d 00 movl 0ドルxd4b2e,(%esp)
 d0905: 89 54 24 08 mov %edx,0x8(%esp)
 d0909: e8 c2 30 00 00 call d39d0 <printf>
 d090e: a1 04 76 0d 00 mov 0xd7604,%eax
 d0913: c7 04 24 43 4b 0d 00 movl 0ドルxd4b43,(%esp)
 d091a: 89 44 24 04 mov %eax,0x4(%esp)
 d091e: e8 ad 30 00 00 call d39d0 <printf>
 d0923: 89 3c 24 mov %edi,(%esp)
 d0926: 8d 45 14 lea 0x14(%ebp),%eax
 d0929: 89 44 24 04 mov %eax,0x4(%esp)
 d092d: e8 7e 30 00 00 call d39b0 <vprintf
On 8/7/07, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> D037C is not particularly interesting. It is just showing that the trap
> handler called halt() after dumping the register state. More interesting is
> cs:eip=10:d0800. This looks like the original trap-6 occurred at linear
> address (0x10<<4)+0xd0800 == 0xd0900. Is there anything interesting in the
> objdump at 0xd0900? (or 0xd0800, as I'm not 100% sure about the cs value).
>
> -- Keir
>
> On 7/8/07 08:58, "Brady Chen" <chenchp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > now I'm using the un-stable version to build hvmloader (only hvmloader
> > rebuild, xen and doman0 kernel is not touched), the same problem.
> >
> > (XEN) HVM1: Trap (0x6) while in real mode
> > (XEN) HVM1: eax D00 ecx 0 edx 71F ebx 71E
> > (XEN) HVM1: esp D74D4 ebp D7520 esi 0 edi D00
> > (XEN) HVM1: trapno 6 errno 0
> > (XEN) HVM1: eip D0800 cs 10 eflags 13046
> > (XEN) HVM1: uesp D75B4 uss 2
> > (XEN) HVM1: ves D4BC8 vds D4D26 vfs D07FE vgs D75B4
> > (XEN) HVM1: cr0 50032 cr2 0 cr3 0 cr4 651
> > (XEN) HVM1:
> > (XEN) HVM1: Halt called from %eip 0xD037C
> >
> > here is some snip from objdump, and i attach the whole objdump as the
> > attachment.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] boot a existing windows in hvm domain , Keir Fraser
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] Re: Why p2m allocation is from hap or shadow preallocated memory? , Tim Deegan
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] boot a existing windows in hvm domain , Keir Fraser
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] boot a existing windows in hvm domain , Keir Fraser
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /