| To: | "Keir Fraser" <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] Which GCC is best for building Xen? |
| From: | "pradeep singh rautela" <rautelap@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 2 Aug 2007 13:06:59 +0530 |
| Cc: | tim.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | 2007年8月02日 00:34:33 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cq/SJzxZnGPbCwbU3hEbbznoAF8gqtE9At/0YrgNCaD5hNgYzs3ADOupCKuQ2jrjYWilZNnUcwrbRSLz9O/+W3w76ZQjrJaSBs4R7/WujqplDeRbFuaLzxJ4oRoWPSpqEMX4VVBhPtmvbecBESVGj4RuqzraPo9Sh+6NhVWew5Y= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Dg/DqKjsy32uApF/h5ugLDSgYv4tHSKheYmvN2fscjv+JZaEX8asQSAZTttkV2t/KipzUvkp2cHRZIIKXTxFqQZJXeCCQbcbvpp58Lz16VpJATzWn3hpe+kMQqjb59qAUqMc5eGIo757ngmX+Fvuzt2ozVURBRP4tUq3n864fMc= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <C2D7466C.1375C%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <6bc632150708020000v4b14a23cgdfaa8542289dac2b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C2D7466C.1375C%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Oh... sorry for missing the point. Thanks for pointing that out, Keir. Regards, --pradeep On 8/2/07, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > GCC 4.x is supported. Any regressions in compatibility with gcc 4.x should > be reported so that they can be fixed -- usually this means avoiding > compiler warnings in subdirectories which are compiled with -Werror. > Subdirectories which do not use -Werror have a reason for that -- e.g., not > wanting to needlessly diverge from upstream qemu by putting in workarounds > for otherwise harmless compiler warnings. > > -- Keir > > On 2/8/07 08:00, "pradeep singh rautela" <rautelap@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > gcc 4.1.2 build fine for me though. > > A little tweaking is certainly required in the config files to lower > > down the paranoia of the GCC compiler for Xen. > > > > BTW Keir, any strong reasons for sticking to GCC 3.4 and not upgrading > > to GCC 4.x series? > > > > Sorry if this has been discussed before, a link to the mail archive > > will be really appreciated. > > -- -- pradeep singh rautela "Genius is 1% inspiration, and 99% perspiration" - not me :) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Which GCC is best for building Xen? , Keir Fraser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH][ELF] Correct space calculation for symtab when BSD_SYMTAB=yes , Christoph Egger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] Which GCC is best for building Xen? , Keir Fraser |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH][ELF] Correct space calculation for symtab when BSD_SYMTAB=yes , Christoph Egger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |