WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/

Xen

Home Products Support Community News

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

<prev [Date] next> <prev [Thread] next>

RE: [Xen-devel] vram_dirty vs. shadow paging dirty tracking

from [Dong, Eddie] [Permanent Link][Original]

To:	"Anthony Liguori" <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Zhai, Edwin" <edwin.zhai@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	RE: [Xen-devel] vram_dirty vs. shadow paging dirty tracking
From:	"Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	2007年3月15日 11:22:53 +0800
Cc:	Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	2007年3月14日 20:22:10 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<45F81C11.1020404@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcdmUvFXBaOfAcqkTc63Kt/CF/kZdwAXHQ0A
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] vram_dirty vs. shadow paging dirty tracking

>
> Compared to what, just updating the full screen 30 times a second? I
> suspect that's not as bad as it sounds since SDL will be using a
> XShmImage. 
>
It depends on how you run the benchmark. In case of multiple VMs case
where multiple Qemus (say 8) are running, this kind of comparation eat
unacceptable cpu cycles.
Eddie
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] vram_dirty vs. shadow paging dirty tracking , Anthony Liguori [Xen-devel] RE: vram_dirty vs. shadow paging dirty tracking , Ian Pratt [Xen-devel] Re: vram_dirty vs. shadow paging dirty tracking , Anthony Liguori RE: [Xen-devel] Re: vram_dirty vs. shadow paging dirty tracking , Ian Pratt Re: [Xen-devel] vram_dirty vs. shadow paging dirty tracking , Zhai, Edwin Re: [Xen-devel] vram_dirty vs. shadow paging dirty tracking , Anthony Liguori Re: [Xen-devel] vram_dirty vs. shadow paging dirty tracking , Zhai, Edwin RE: [Xen-devel] vram_dirty vs. shadow paging dirty tracking, Dong, Eddie <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [Xen-devel] Possibilities with Xen3 compared to IBM Power5 DLPAR , Mark Williamson
Next by Date:	[Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch for performance , Zhai, Edwin
Previous by Thread:	Re: [Xen-devel] vram_dirty vs. shadow paging dirty tracking , Zhai, Edwin
Next by Thread:	[Xen-devel] vlapic warning messages , Ky Srinivasan
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy

Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix