On 9/3/07 10:17, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The build-system approach looks simplest (certainly smaller than the C code)
>> but is impenetrable to read. I think we'd take that approach if you add some
>> comments to explain what's going on in the makefile runes.
>
> I didn't follow up on this so far because kernel mainline seems to want the
> fix
> for paravirt guests, too, but seems more favorable of the C approach. I
> haven't
> seen anything new on this during the last two days anymore, so would want
> to re-inquire whether you wouldn't then change your mind on which approach
> to take.
I'm happy to follow mainline's preferences, since they've expressed them.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel