On 6/3/07 22:59, "Graham, Simon" <Simon.Graham@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It seems to me that the right thing to do here is to have the link up on
> the VIF in advance of the domain resuming on the target but I'm guessing
> that this would cause netback to have conniptions...
We'll have to think about this a bit. The carrier flag is currently being
used as a handy software flag inside netback to indicate whether the device
channel is fully set up or not. I think what you propose will essentially be
a reversion of one of Herbert Xu's patches from some time ago (where he
removed an explicit software flag and started using the carrier flag
instead).
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel