| To: | <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,"Keir Fraser" <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7/10] linux 2.6.18: time handling |
| From: | "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2007年3月05日 15:09:39 +0000 |
| Delivery-date: | 2007年3月05日 07:08:21 -0800 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <C211E1BA.A991%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <45EC0A4C.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx> <C211E1BA.A991%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
>... and independent_wallclock probably stops working. We didn't notice any malfunction in time handling so far (which included the released SuSE 10.2) - how would you expect such a problem to surface? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7/10] linux 2.6.18: time handling , Keir Fraser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] Vif rate limiting , Padala, Pradeep |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7/10] linux 2.6.18: time handling , Keir Fraser |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7/10] linux 2.6.18: time handling , Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |