WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-staging] [xen-unstable] Added some more fields

To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>, <ewan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-staging] [xen-unstable] Added some more fields to host_cpu.
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2007年3月02日 20:46:05 +0000
Cc: Jimi Xenidis <jimix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2007年3月02日 12:45:07 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1172867986.5941.49.camel@bling >
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcddC8viCj77Ksj/Edu9iAAWy6hiGQ==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-staging] [xen-unstable] Added some more fields to host_cpu.
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.3.061214
On 2/3/07 20:39, "Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On ia64, dom0 doesn't automatically get vcpus for each physical cpu,
> so the first problem is that we're not going to have a /proc/cpuinfo
> entry for every cpu in self.cpus.keys. I think it's likely x86 could
> run into this problem too if a cpu was hotplugged or booted with the
> dom0_max_vcpus options.
We have indeed hit this problem and I put a patch in this afternoon to
duplicate cpu0's info for any non-existent cpu. Given that the dom0 cpus
could be migrating around on arbitrary physical cpus (even across the
multiple CPUID invocations that the kernel will have made to build the
information for a single 'cpu' in /proc!) this is fine -- x86 multiprocessor
systems are supposed to be symmetric (homogeneous CPUs down to the same
stepping in some cases) anyway.
 -- Keir
> The second problem is that /proc/cpuinfo fields are very architecture
> specific. I'd suggest importing arch and having separate cases for x86,
> ia64, and powerpc. For ia64, think the most appropriate mapping would
> be:
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-staging] [xen-unstable] Added some more fields to host_cpu. , John Levon
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-staging] [xen-unstable] Added some more fields to host_cpu. , John Levon
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-staging] [xen-unstable] Added some more fields to host_cpu. , John Levon
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-staging] [xen-unstable] Added some more fields to host_cpu. , Alex Williamson
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /