| To: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] hvm_op.h misses explicit license |
| From: | John Levon <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2007年1月23日 20:49:22 +0000 |
| Delivery-date: | 2007年1月23日 12:47:07 -0800 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.9i |
hvm_op.h doesn't have the license block like other public header files. I didn't check for other cases, but could this inconsistency be fixed? thanks john _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] event TRC_MEM_PAGE_GRANT_TRANSFER , Rob Gardner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] [MINI-OS] Added domctl and sysctl hypercalls , Grzegorz Milos |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] TLB flushing , Ky Srinivasan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] hvm_op.h misses explicit license , Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |