On 23/1/07 7:47 am, "Jürgen Groß" <juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> It just seems a lot of plumbing for something not very useful, at least to
>> users. You can dump memory via 'xm dump' after all if that's your goal (or
>> will be able to when Isaku's patches go in). Would anyone else in the ai64
>> community like to speak up for these patches?
>
> I think there is a big difference between 'xm dump' and a dump done by domU.
> Detailed error analysis might be possible only with a dump taken via domU as
> the dump analysis tools will work in most cases on the domU specific dump
> format only.
> Outside the Linux world :-) (e.g. in most UNIX flavors) crash dump analysis
> is very useful!
> I would strongly support Masaki's patches.
If that's the aim then perhaps the xm command should be given a better name.
'xm os-init' is rather meaningless outside the context of physical INIT
buttons on ia64 systems -- not a very generic concept to export to a VM
management tool! Perhaps 'xm os-dump' with a guest-specific backend
implementation in xend (default to fail with an error message).
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel