WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue

To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2007年1月19日 13:03:14 +0100
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxx>, Xen devel list <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2007年1月19日 04:02:47 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1169203389.6453.23.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Ian Campbell's message of "2007年1月19日 10:43:09 +0000")
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C1D56D8B.7D71%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1169203389.6453.23.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Thu, 2007年01月18日 at 18:31 +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:
>> This is even better than with blkfront/blkback because there are definitely
>> no PV-on-HVM pvfb driver frontends out in the wild (and it's HVM that makes
>> things harder).
>
> PV on HVM for fbfront is pretty hard since the kernel.org tree does not
> export zap_page_range to modules, neither do many of the older distro
> kernels I've looked at.
>
> I tried doing a compat version like with other such functions but it
> ended up pulling half of mm/memory.c into the compat layer which I don't
> like.
>
> Do I vaguely recall plans to get rid of the use of zap_page_range or is
> my memory playing tricks?
>
> Ian.
We'd like to replace zap_page_range() with unmap_mapping_range(), for
several good reasons:
* it is already fully exported,
* it deals with locking automatically via the address_space
 i_mmap_lock spinlock,
* it automatically iterates over all the vmas on the address_space
 without us having to loop over them ourselves.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue , Keir Fraser
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]mini-os: last changes for ia64 port , Dietmar Hahn
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue , Ian Campbell
Next by Thread: [Xen-devel] Does vt-x itself have perf. impact on Hypervisor w/o considering HVM? , Liang Yang
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /