WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue

To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxx>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2007年1月18日 18:31:39 +0000
Cc: Xen devel list <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2007年1月18日 10:33:07 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <45AF93A7.50107@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acc7LuRpIrFEJ6ciEdu4iwAX8io7RQ==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620
On 18/1/07 15:35, "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Excuse my ignorance, but why do you have to guess the guest's size?
>> Doesn't dom0 know?
>
> No, right now there is no hypercall to get that information. Which
> brings the discussion back onto the table: Should we add one? pvfb
> isn't the only driver with that kind of problems.
>
> And it better shouldn't be a dom0-only hypercall, otherwise driver
> domains will not be able to use it ...
Do the same as you did with blkback. Add a protocol version or bitwidth
field to xenstore. Update frontend driver to write that field. Make tools
write a default value for pv guests for backward compat. This is even better
than with blkfront/blkback because there are definitely no PV-on-HVM pvfb
driver frontends out in the wild (and it's HVM that makes things harder).
Speaking of which, we should add the protocol/bitwidth field to blkfront
asap...
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] VM wait stats , Rik van Riel
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] Problem with VLANs on tg3 NICs , Evan Bigall
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue , Daniel P. Berrange
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue , Gerd Hoffmann
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /